Quantcast
Channel: Physics
Viewing all 778 articles
Browse latest View live

This gruesome animation of a bleeding leg might save your life one day

$
0
0

bleeding leg computer simulation animation

In the movies, the leg is arguably the best place to be shot; bad guys hardly seem to react to the injuries. But in reality, leg wounds can result in amputated limbs or even death, if a piece of shrapnel or a bullet ruptures particular veins or arteries.

Now scientists have precisely modeled the fluid dynamics of a gunshot wound to the leg, in order to better staunch the bleeding in emergency situations. The researchers presented their work last week at the conference of the American Physics Society, as New Scientist reports.

Though other researchers have modeled the fluid dynamics of blood and looked at the effects of gunshot and shrapnel wounds to various parts of the body, this is the first time this modeling has been done for the legs, which are a very common site of injury — not only from gunshots, but also from mines and IEDs.

To create the simulation, the researchers created scans of different layers of the leg: the hard bone, the soft tissue (containing muscle and blood vessels), and the skin encapsulating it all.

Working with pre-determined rates of blood flow from specific arteries and veins, they then used a well-known model of fluid dynamics to simulate how much blood would exit the body, should the bullet pass through certain parts of the leg:

The researchers hope to use these simulations for real-time training exercises for combat medics. That would allow the doctors to immediately test different methods of staunching the bleeding from wounds in order to perform better in real-life battlefield scenarios.

The models are certainly an improvement on the current training method, which requires doctors to work on animals. But the models aren't perfect—they don't take into account things like broken bones or multiple wounds on the same limb.

As the models become more sophisticated, however, they may be able to incorporate more variables. But for now, the researchers are satisfied that their work has brought them one step closer to eradicating the animal models.

"We're genuinely hopeful that our simulations will enhance the educational experience for medical trainees," Jeff Eldredge, the director of the Simulations of Flow Physics and Acoustic laboratory at the University of California Los Angeles who led the research, told New Scientist. "But I'm really pleased just to get visceral reactions from my kids. That probably makes me a horrible father."

Keep scrolling to see other animations created by the researchers.

This article was written by Alexandra Ossola from Popular Science and was legally licensed through the NewsCred publisher network.

The scientists modeled blood loss from a major artery.

RAW Embed



And bleeding from smaller veins, too.

RAW Embed



They also used 3D data of bone, soft tissue, and skin to simulate a human leg.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

A Harvard physicist explains why we could be in the middle of the sixth mass extinction

18 gifts that math nerds actually want

$
0
0

Lobachevsky math

Math is awesome.

It is beautiful in its own right and a way by which we can understand the world.

That being said, those who bravely pursue fields that heavily use mathematics may sometimes feel like they want to rip their hair out.

To help ease the pain, Business Insider put together a list of small gifts and gadgets that math lovers might appreciate.

So if you know someone who has a probability final coming up, or spends nearly a hundred hours a week working on excel sheets, here are some things you can get them this holiday season.

A nifty bottle opener for the poor souls pursuing their PhDs.

If you're a fan of the Möbius strip, say hello to the Klein bottle. To put it simply, it's a closed surface with only one side and is formed by passing one end of a tube through the side and then joining at the end. It doesn't have an inside or an outside.

But it's also a cool way to open your beers.

And if you'd like something a bit more classic, you can also get yourself a π bottle opener.

Klein bottle opener: $64

π bottle opener: $30



A book or two to sharpen your chess skills.

"My 60 Memorable Games" is a masterpiece. It's one of the most important chess books, written by one of the game's greatest legends, Bobby Fischer. If you're a serious chess player, you need to have it.

Plus, if you are rated under 2000, we recommend looking at Ludek Pachman's "Modern Chess Strategy," a concise and highly readable text.

"My 60 Memorable Games":$18.86

"Modern Chess Strategy": $13.67



A mini attachable "telescope" for your iPhone.

This mini "telescope" camera attaches to your iPhone and comes with 18x magnification and a tripod.

It's a fun, astrophysics-ish gadget, and is easier to lug around that a professional camera.

Telescope camera lens: $33.99



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

This amazing new camera can see around corners

$
0
0

image 20151207 3133 79fjh0

How can a person see around a blind corner? One answer is to develop X-ray vision. A more mundane approach is to use a mirror. But if neither are an option, a group of scientists led by Genevieve Gariepy have developed a state-of-the-art detector which, with some clever data processing techniques, can turn walls and floors into a "virtual mirror", giving the power to locate and track moving objects out of direct line of sight.

The shiny surface of a mirror works by reflecting scattered light from an object at a well-defined angle towards your eye. Because light scattered from different points on the object is reflected at the same angle, your eye sees a clear image of the object. In contrast, a non-reflective surface scatters light randomly in all directions, and creates no clear image.

However, as the researchers at Heriot-Watt University and the University of Edinburgh recognised, there is a way to tease out information on the object even from apparently random scattered light. Their method, published in Nature Photonics, relies on laser range-finding technology, which measures the distance to an object based on the time it takes a pulse of light to travel to the object, scatter, and travel back to a detector.

image 20151207 3125 1ikdij2In principle, the measurement is quite simple. A laser pulse is bounced off the floor and scatters in all directions. A small fraction of the laser light strikes the object, and the back-scattered light is recorded on a patch of floor – the "virtual mirror"– next to the spot the laser strikes. Because the speed of light is known and constant, by measuring the time interval between the start of the laser pulse and the scattered light reaching the patch of floor, the position of the object can be triangulated.

However, the devil is in the detail. The timing measurement needs to be accurate to within around 500 billionths of a second (5x10-7, or 500 nanoseconds), and the light levels that must be detected are extremely low. Overcoming both of these obstacles requires some serious laser and detector technology. The laser pulses used for the timing measurement are just ten femtoseconds (100,000 billionths of a second, or 10-15) long, and each pixel in the ultra-sensitive "camera" (known as a single-pixel avalanche diode array, or SPAD) used to image the patch of floor is essentially an ultrafast stopwatch that records the arrival time of the scattered light pulse to within a few hundred billionths of a second.

The complications do not end there. Light scattered from the object of interest reaches the virtual mirror of the floor, but so does light scattered from every other object in the vicinity. The success of this technique requires that the two be separated, the "signal" of the hidden object from the background noise of everything else.

This is achieved by using the fact that the hidden object the device is trying to detect is moving, while other nearby objects are not. Because the moving object generates a signal in the virtual mirror that changes with time, it can be filtered from the constant background signal produced by the stationary objects of the surroundings.

image 20151207 3108 131s1o6The final complication is that the timing measurement for scattered light arriving at a single point on the virtual mirror and recorded by a single pixel in the detector unfortunately doesn't locate the object to a single unique position. A similar time delay could result from objects located at any number of different positions located an appropriate distance from the virtual mirror.

While the timing data from a single pixel only locates the object to a range of positions, the range is different for each pixel. However, it turns out that there is only a single position at which the timing condition is satisfied simultaneously for all pixels, and this allows the object to be unambiguously identified from the background signals.

The prototype camera system allows the object's position behind the wall to be localised to within a centimetre or two, and by making measurements every few seconds the camera can also detect the speed of a moving object. In contrast to previous methods, which required long data processing times, the new method can track moving objects in real time. At present it's limited to locating objects up to 60cm away from the virtual mirror on the floor, but this should improve to around ten metres, as well as to more closely detect the shapes of hidden objects as well as their positions.

So while it's not quite as promising, or as convenient, as the science-fiction powers of X-ray vision, the study's authors note that the technology has interesting future applications in areas such as surveillance – to detect a moving person behind a wall, for example – or in car safety systems to detect incoming vehicles approaching around corners.

Claire Vallance, Professor of Physical Chemistry, University of Oxford

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: There's a hidden map in your iPhone of everywhere you've been

Follow this simple physics trick and you'll never get shocked by your car again

$
0
0

A logo of Volkswagen is seen on a Golf car parked at a dealership in Seoul, South Korea, November 25, 2015. Picture taken November 25, 2015.  REUTERS/Kim Hong-Ji

If you're like me, it feels like every time you touch something metal, you get a shock.

Cars in particular are a problem for those of us prone to static. But what exactly is causing these shocks, and what can you do to stop them happening? 

Physics Girl is here to break it down for you, and she's got the simplest trick so far for preventing electric shocks.

First of all, you need to understand how a shock works.

Static charge builds up when an object's surface has lost a lot of electrons and builds up a positive charge.

Using a trusty Van de Graaff generator (which you may remember as that zappy sphere from high school science class), Physics Girl demonstrates how electrons will leap through the air from another object to try and restore the balance, creating a spark and a loud electric shock in the process.

And this is where things get fun. If you place a metal tray on top of the generator, it'll take on the same positive charge because it's conductive. And when the generator is turned on, the pan flies off like magic, because like charges repel like charges.

So then why does the same thing happens with a styrofoam bowl, which is an insulator? As Physics Girl explains, this is due to the same phenomenon that causes us to get electric shocks all the time.

To trigger that phenomenon, a violent event has to occur to strip electrons off one material and onto another, creating a positively and negatively charged surface. That sounds extreme, but that type of event could be something as simple as taking off your jumper, or sliding out of a car seat.

Over time, the excess electrons in the now-negatively charged object (AKA your body) will dissipate into the air. But when conditions are particularly cold and dry, or if you touch something else too soon, the electrons are going to fly off you, creating – you guessed it – a shock.

So how do you stop that happening? Physics Girl explains much better than us, so watch the video below to find out. But we'll give you a hint, it involves not allowing yourself to get isolated in the first place. Thank you, science.

SEE ALSO: 18 gifts that math nerds actually want

CHECK OUT: The incredible scientist who died from the very thing that won her two Nobel Prizes

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A Harvard physicist explains why we could be in the middle of the sixth mass extinction

Here's how ridiculously fast we could visit everything in the solar system if we traveled at the speed of light

$
0
0

For humans, the mysteriously wondrous planets and moons in our solar system are ridiculously far away and can take many years to reach.

But for light traveling at 670 million mph, even the farthest regions of our solar system are just a few hours away. Imagine how much more humankind could explore with a spaceship that traveled near the speed of light.

Here's a glimpse of just how close everything in our solar system is from Earth when you're racing along at the speed of light. We used the average distance that Earth is from each of the exciting destinations shown below:

BI_Graphics_The entire solar system is only light minutes away_02

CHECK OUT: This 1-minute animation will change your perception of life in the universe

SEE ALSO: MIT scientists have charted a course for Mars that they say beats NASA's by a landslide

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This 3-minute animation will change your perception of time

Don't believe that viral image showing how dolphins 'see' humans with their voice

$
0
0

dolphin underwater

When a dolphin clicks and squeaks, it is usually using these high-pitched sounds to "see" its underwater environment.

Dolphins, and other toothed whales, use echolocation to help them identify objects underwater when it gets too dark to see with their eyes.

The animals emit sounds, and when these sounds hit something, they bounce back for the dolphins to interpret. Bats use echolocation, too.

SpeakDolphin, a non-profit that aims to help dolphins communicate with humans, claims that by recording these sounds and interpreting them with a device called a CymaScope, they were able to show what a dolphin "saw" when it looked at a man underwater.

First, here they are:

dolphinviewThe enhanced image on the right looks like a man. But it's unclear how SpeakDolphin actually made these images.

SpeakDolphin released these images on December 4, that a numberofnewsoutletscovered.

But these images aren't supported by any published science and the process used to create them hasn't been vetted through the peer-review process.

No results for "CymaScope" in Google Scholar or PubMed show any studies that have been published in the past in peer-reviewed journals.

Jack Kassewitz, founder of SpeakDolphin, told Tech Insider says they've been collaborating with physics and cognition researchers: "At every stage, we've gone to the best researchers in the world that we have."

So Tech Insider asked Justin Gregg, a senior research associate and vice president of the Dolphin Communication Project who isn't associated with SpeakDolphin and hasn't collaborated with Kassewitz, about the find. He dug into the CymaScope's unknown scientific history in his book, "Are Dolphins Really Smart?"

He told Tech Insider that he couldn't speculate on how the images were made or on the claims that SpeakDolphin was making about them based only on a press release.

Kassewitz told Tech Insider that he chooses to publish his research in book format instead of journals so people don't have to buy a journal article to read the research. He said: "We do open source. I publish and let people help us. If you can find something wrong with it, help us."

Gregg said he and other dolphin researchers have tried finding out more about CymaScope from the UK lab and SpeakDolphin the last time they released images, but received no response.

Gregg said he is reserving judgment until he sees published and peer-reviewed studies on their technology.

"The researchers involved in generating these images have not published any scientific articles (peer-reviewed or otherwise) which would allow the scientific community to evaluate what is going on with their work,"Gregg wrote in a blog post on the latest images. "The scientific community is waiting on published studies to properly determine the legitimacy the claims being made."

In the press release, SpeakDolphin says they obtained these images by submerging a man underwater with a female dolphin named Amaya at the Dolphin Discovery Centre in Puerto Aventuras, Mexico. He recorded Amaya's noises with a high frequency microphone, and then SpeakDolphin sent the audio to the CymaScope lab in the UK.

"The basic principle of the CymaScope instrument is that it transcribes sonic periodicities to water wavelet periodicties, in other words, the sound sample is imprinted onto a water membrane," said John Stuart Reid, an acoustic physics researcher at the CymaScope lab, in the press release. "The ability of the CymaScope to capture what-the-dolphin-saw images relates to the quasi-holographic properties of sound and its relationship with water, which will be described in a forthcoming science paper on this subject."

We asked Kassewitz for more clarification about the systems used, but he didn't offer more details.

Kassewitz responded to this article by saying: "I am totally open to criticism, but from physicists, because that's what is going on here."

While these images may be too good to be believed, we do know that dolphins can identify the size, shape, speed, distance, and direction of objects using echolocation. They are so good, they can even distinguish between objects the size of a kernel of corn up to 50 feet away, according to the National Marine Mammal Laboratory.

But it's best to reserve judgment on the idea that these images show us what dolphins can "see" with their echolocation skills.

This post was updated with comments from Jack Kassewitz, founder of SpeakDolphin.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Hundreds of whales have mysteriously washed up on the shores of Chile

This 78-page book on physics is selling more copies than 'Fifty Shades of Grey'

$
0
0

Screen Shot 2015 12 11 at 12.31.22 PM

Apparently, Italians find physics more sexy than S&M — at least for reading material.

Since it was published last September, Carlo Rovelli's book, "Seven Brief Lessons on Physics," has sold more copies in Rovelli's native country, Italy, than E.L. James' smash hit "Fifty Shades of Grey," The Spectator reported.

And the English translation has quickly risen to become Penguin's fastest-selling science debut in the publishing company's history.

So what's Rovelli's secret?

After all, it's not like physics is a topic that people flock toward. In fact, physics has been the least popular STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) major for US undergraduates since the late '60s.

For starters, Rovelli is an expert on the topic.

Screen Shot 2015 12 11 at 12.31.59 PMHe's a theoretical physicist by profession with a focus in quantum gravity — a field that attempts to join the greatest two theories in history: Isaac Newton's theory of gravity and Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity.

Rovelli is also an avid writer of popular science, so he has a habit of transforming complex ideas into clear, simple concepts.

"Rovelli has a rare knack for conveying the top line of scientific theories in clear and compelling terms without succumbing to the lure of elaborate footnotes," Nicola Davis, the commissioning editor of Tech Monthly, reported in The Guardian.

Another advantage is that his book is only 78 pages long — not so scary a length for such an intimidating subject. And the topics don't throw any of the book's readers off the deep end, according to the author.

"It covers modern physics and is written for people who know nothing about modern science," Rovelli said in a promotional video by Penguin. "What is heat? What is space? What is time? And especially ... how many mysteries are still [out] there. It focuses on the large amount of things we don't know rather than what we do know."

You can learn more about Rovelli's book on SevenBriefLessons.com. There, you can listen to brief experts from the book, read by Rovelli, as well as play around with the interactive webpages associated with each of the book's seven sections.

Check out more about Rovelli and his latest book on YouTube, or below:

READ MORE: We visited the most powerful rocket ever built — and it was even better than we expected

SEE ALSO: Sending humans to Mars could uncover a disturbing truth to one of life's greatest mysteries

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This 3-minute animation will change your perception of time


Those viral images of a dolphin 'seeing' a human with its voice aren't supported by science

$
0
0

dolphin underwater

When a dolphin clicks and squeaks, it is usually using these high-pitched sounds to "see" its underwater environment.

Dolphins, and other toothed whales, use echolocation to help them identify objects underwater when it gets too dark to see with their eyes.

The animals emit sounds, and when these sounds hit something, they bounce back for the dolphins to interpret. Bats use echolocation, too.

SpeakDolphin, a non-profit that aims to help dolphins communicate with humans, claims that by recording these sounds and interpreting them with a device called a CymaScope, they were able to show what a dolphin "saw" when it looked at a man underwater.

First, here they are:

dolphinviewThe enhanced image on the right looks like a man. But it's unclear how SpeakDolphin actually made these images.

SpeakDolphin released these images on December 4, that a numberofnewsoutletscovered.

But these images aren't supported by any published science and the process used to create them hasn't been vetted through the peer-review process.

No results for "CymaScope" in Google Scholar or PubMed show any studies that have been published in the past in peer-reviewed journals.

Jack Kassewitz, founder of SpeakDolphin, told Tech Insider says they've been collaborating with physics and cognition researchers: "At every stage, we've gone to the best researchers in the world that we have."

So Tech Insider asked Justin Gregg, a senior research associate and vice president of the Dolphin Communication Project who isn't associated with SpeakDolphin and hasn't collaborated with Kassewitz, about the find. He dug into the CymaScope's unknown scientific history in his book, "Are Dolphins Really Smart?"

He told Tech Insider that he couldn't speculate on how the images were made or on the claims that SpeakDolphin was making about them based only on a press release.

Kassewitz told Tech Insider that he chooses to publish his research in book format instead of journals so people don't have to buy a journal article to read the research. He said: "We do open source. I publish and let people help us. If you can find something wrong with it, help us."

Gregg said he and other dolphin researchers have tried finding out more about CymaScope from the UK lab and SpeakDolphin the last time they released images, but received no response.

Gregg said he is reserving judgment until he sees published and peer-reviewed studies on their technology.

"The researchers involved in generating these images have not published any scientific articles (peer-reviewed or otherwise) which would allow the scientific community to evaluate what is going on with their work,"Gregg wrote in a blog post on the latest images. "The scientific community is waiting on published studies to properly determine the legitimacy the claims being made."

In the press release, SpeakDolphin says they obtained these images by submerging a man underwater with a female dolphin named Amaya at the Dolphin Discovery Centre in Puerto Aventuras, Mexico. He recorded Amaya's noises with a high frequency microphone, and then SpeakDolphin sent the audio to the CymaScope lab in the UK.

"The basic principle of the CymaScope instrument is that it transcribes sonic periodicities to water wavelet periodicties, in other words, the sound sample is imprinted onto a water membrane," said John Stuart Reid, an acoustic physics researcher at the CymaScope lab, in the press release. "The ability of the CymaScope to capture what-the-dolphin-saw images relates to the quasi-holographic properties of sound and its relationship with water, which will be described in a forthcoming science paper on this subject."

We asked Kassewitz for more clarification about the systems used, but he didn't offer more details.

Kassewitz responded to this article by saying: "I am totally open to criticism, but from physicists, because that's what is going on here."

While these images may be too good to be believed, we do know that dolphins can identify the size, shape, speed, distance, and direction of objects using echolocation. They are so good, they can even distinguish between objects the size of a kernel of corn up to 50 feet away, according to the National Marine Mammal Laboratory.

But it's best to reserve judgment on the idea that these images show us what dolphins can "see" with their echolocation skills.

This post was updated with comments from Jack Kassewitz, founder of SpeakDolphin.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Hundreds of whales have mysteriously washed up on the shores of Chile

Astronomers just predicted the replay of a star's violent death for the first time

$
0
0

supernova star explosion

For the first time ever, astronomers have successfully predicted when and where the monstrous explosion of a star, called a supernova, would occur.

Astronomers made the prediction in November 2015 based on a strange-looking image from the Hubble Space Telescope. The photo, taken in 2014, shows four supernovas blowing up at once.

In reality, the supernovas are actually one exploding star: The blast's light was magnified and twisted by a phenomenon called gravitational lensing, which made the star appear in four different places.

After studying the image further, the astronomers predicted they'd see the same explosion yet again— but in a different place — sometime in the next few months.

A new report in the Astronomer's Telegraph now confirms they were correct.

Albert Einstein predicted gravitational lenses would form around really big objects, which are massive enough to bend and warp the fabric of space — and light — around themselves:

Gravitational lensing galaxy

The phenomenon can make other objects around it appear magnified or even in multiple places at once. And that's exactly what happened to this particular supernova.

The star blew up more than 9 billion light-years away from us, but about half way on its journey to Hubble, light from the cataclysmic blast met a huge cluster of galaxies called MACS J1149+2223.

The galaxy cluster bent and warped the supernova's light so much that by the time it reached Hubble, an image of the explosion appeared in four different places at once:

supernova1

The supernova faded not long after astronomers first spotted it in 2014. However, they predicted that the explosion would replay again somewhere in the same gravitational lens in late 2015 or early 2016.

Sure enough, on December 10, Hubble captured an image of the supernova replaying a fifth time. The University of California, Berkeley posted the new image, below.

The first four explosions observed back in 2014 are named S1, S2, S3, and S4, while the location of the new, predicted explosion is labeled "SX," which appears as a dim blob in the top half of the image:

supernova gravitational lensing

The replay happened because the light took a longer path around and through the gravity lens than the explosion's first appearance.

The successful prediction should help astronomers better understand how gravitational lensing works, and use it as a valuable tool to study the deep, distant universe.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's what you actually see while you're watching a meteor shower

Outraged physicists formally rebut Supreme Court justice's comments about racial diversity in science education

$
0
0

Affirmative Action

In the wake of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's apparent endorsement of the claim that affirmative action hurts black scientists, professional physicists have written a letter to the Supreme Court denouncing the claims.

Scalia's comments were made during oral arguments in Fisher vs. University of Texas, in which a white student claimed affirmative action policies prevented her from attending the university because of her race. 

"We object to the use of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) fields as a paper tiger in the debate over affirmative action. We as professional scientists are in strong support of affirmative action policies," the physicists wrote in the letter, which has been signed by more than 2,000 scientists.

Furthermore, "science is not an endeavor which should depend on the credentials of the scientist," the physicists wrote. "Rather, a good scientist is one who does good science."

A discredited theory

During the hearing, Scalia cited a legal brief in the case that he said made the provocative claim that some black students may do better at "less-advanced" or "slower-track" schools. It's not clear which brief he was referring to, though it's possible he was talking about one filed by two opponents of affirmative action, lawyers Gail Heriot and Peter Kirsanow.

"One of the [legal] briefs pointed out that most of the black scientists in this country don't come from schools like the University of Texas,"Scalia said. "They come from lesser schools where they do not feel that they’re being pushed ahead in classes that are too fast for them."

In their letter, physicists rejected Scalia's claims, which are based on the so-called "mismatch theory," which suggests affirmative action harms minority students by placing them in environments for which they aren't prepared. Researchers say the theory has been widely discredited.

"Study after study tells us that whether one looks at graduation rates or future earnings, minorities admitted to more selective schools with an assist from affirmative action do at least as well as and more often better than they could have been expected to do had they gone to less selective institutions," Richard Lempert, a law professor at the University of Michigan, told the Guardian.

Why we need people of color in science

The physicists' letter also took issue with questions from Chief Justice John Roberts, who expressed impatience about affirmative action. "What unique perspective does a minority student bring to a physics class?" Roberts asked.

The scientists rejected the idea that minority students, or students of color, are there simply to enhance the experience of white students, countering with the question, what unique perspective does a white student bring? Instead, we should be asking, "Why does physics education routinely fail brilliant minority students?" they wrote.

They also stressed that affirmative action is "just one part" of a larger effort to achieve social justice in scientific fields.

NEXT: UT lawyer had the perfect response when Justice Scalia suggested some blacks go to a 'slower-track school'

SEE ALSO: Looming Supreme Court battle could be a major blow to affirmative action

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A Supreme Court Justice is under fire for racial remarks he made at a hearing

This is some of the best research ever inspired by 'Star Wars'

$
0
0

luke skywalker

"Star Wars" is one of the most-loved science fiction series of all time, and it has attracted a fiercely loyal fan base over the decades.

A good number of those mega-fans are working scientists, and their passion for the books and movies has led to some hilarious yet surprisingly legitimate research.

In honor of the upcoming release of "Star Wars: The Force Awakens," we've rounded up some of the best science studies and experiments inspired by the franchise.

This is by no means a comprehensive list, but it does contain some of our favorites.

Scientists created a lightsaber...sort of.

Star Wars fans across the globe rejoiced in 2013 when scientists accidentally created a strip of light particles they said behaved just like a lightsaber.

The team had figured out a way to get particles of light to stick together and form a molecule — the same physics principle behind a lightsaber.

The bad news is that you can't actually duel with the lab-grown lightsabers. The problem, as astrophysicist and host of StarTalk Radio Neil deGrasse Tyson explains, is that most beams of light just pass right through each other.

If scientists ever figure out how to harness much more powerful, energetic light sources like gamma rays, then technically we might be able to create real lightsabers. That's because gamma rays will interact with other gamma rays and create a force, as physicist Briax Cox explained.

Can we get someone on that, stat? Because we'd really like to start our Jedi Knight training.



The Rebel Alliance probably left the galaxy in a devastating economic depression after the Battle of Endor.

RAW Embed

In a fantastically written research paper called "It's a Trap: Emperor Palpatine's Poison Pill," economics researcher Zachary Feinstein calculated that the Death Star cost approximately $193 Quintillion (in 2012 U.S. dollars), and the gross domestic product (GDP) of the galactic economy was roughly $4.6 Sextillion a year.

Banks in the galactic empire are likely invested in the Death Star and Feinstein estimates they hold about 60% of that mind-blowingly huge GDP. So after rebel terrorists blow up the Death Star in the Battle of Endor, Feinstein concludes they would have sent the economy into a tailspin and created biggest financial crash we've ever seen.

"In this case study we found that the Rebel Alliance would need to prepare a bailout of at least 15%, and likely at least 20%, of [GDP] in order to mitigate the systemic risks and the sudden and catastrophic economic collapse," Feinstein writes. "Without such funds at the ready, it likely the Galactic economy would enter an economic depression of astronomical proportions."

 



Faster-than-light travel would have made Luke Skywalker way younger than his twin sister Leia.

Einstein's theory of general relativity suggests that time slows down the faster you travel. It's called time dilation and scientists have already demonstrated it really happens.

In "Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back," Luke and Leia are separated. Leia takes the Millennium Falcon to Cloud City, while Luke takes an X-Wing Starfighter to Dagobah to start his Jedi training with Yoda.

The Millennium Falcon can fly faster than Luke's X-Wing, so Leia’s journey yields a time dilation of about 63 days. But the journey to Dagobah is about 25 times the distance to Cloud City, so Luke is traveling at a fast speed for much longer than Leia. The students estimate his time dilation is about 701 days (1.92 years).

That means that Luke ends up about 1.75 years younger than Leia by the end of the movie.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

These incredible photos reveal split-second moments of one of the most mysterious natural phenomena in the sky

$
0
0

This might look like an egregiously misplaced school of fish, but it's actually an example of what ornithologists (bird experts) call a murmuration:

birdsgifIt's a flock of hundreds to thousands of tiny song birds called starlings. But exactly how the birds within these swarms decide to move and when is a complete mystery.

Within a murmuration, starlings are constantly on the move, so the shape is always changing. 

But some photographers managed to capture some incredible, split-second moments of these flowing flocks that look strikingly similar to common shapes, like a gigantic smoking pipe, a goose, and a stingray. Check them out below:

CHECK OUT: Here's what can happen when you eat too much salt

SEE ALSO: Sending humans to Mars could uncover a disturbing truth to one of life's greatest mysteries

Starlings are indigenous to Europe, Asia, and Africa, but have since been introduced to North America and northern Australia. So if you live where these birds are prevalent, then you might catch this crazy phenomenon, like the stingray-shaped murmuration shown below:

Source: Murmuration of Starlings



There are nearly 120 species of starlings, and they don't seem to mind mixing it up. In fact, starlings are famous for their gregarious nature. You can find multiple different species within the same murmuration.



During nonbreeding seasons, starlings will roost together in groups of hundreds to thousands. It's usually during this same time that you'll see giant murmurations like this goose-shaped one:



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Neil deGrasse Tyson explains how 'Star Wars' lightsabers could actually work

$
0
0


"Star Wars"
lightsabers are a novel idea. They're lightweight, portable, and their laser-like beams can cut through just about anything. Unfortunately, the reality isn't so simple. Astrophysicist and "StarTalk Radio" host Neil deGrasse Tyson explains how the fictional blade would work in real life.

Produced by Christine NguyenDarren Weaver and Kamelia Angelova. Additional production by Rob Ludacer.

Follow TI: On Facebook


StarTalk Radio is a podcast and radio program hosted by astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, where comic co-hosts, guest celebrities, and scientists discuss astronomy, physics, and everything else about life in the universe. Follow StarTalk Radio on Twitter, and watch StarTalk Radio "Behind the Scenes" on YouTube.

Join the conversation about this story »

Can you really kill someone by dropping a penny off the Empire State Building?

$
0
0

According to myth, a penny dropped from the Empire State Building can kill someone below.

But is it true?

Mythbusters tested it out. They made a gun that can fire a penny at 64.4 miles per hour — the same speed at which a penny dropped from the top of the Empire State Building would hit the ground at.

They launched it into a ballistics dummy and found that it only caused a little damage. Then, they shot each other with the gun, and while it stung, it didn't really do any harm — certainly not enough to kill someone.

Apparently the myth is simply not true. A penny just can't gather enough velocity from the top of the Empire State Building to do any real harm.

Footage was proved by "Mythbusters", which airs on The Science Channel. To celebrate the show's final season, they'll be airing every single episode in a row starting at midnight on December 23rd.

Story by Jacob Shamsian and editing by Stephen Parkhurst

INSIDER IS ON FACEBOOK:  Follow us here

INSIDER is on YouTube: Subscribe here

SEE ALSO: Here's how factories make soft pretzels

Join the conversation about this story »


Neil deGrasse Tyson just pointed out a huge problem with the BB-8 droid from 'Star Wars'

$
0
0

StarTalk Radio host Neil deGrasse Tyson took to Twitter on Monday, December 21, to deliver his first impressions of "Star Wars: The Force Awakens."

The new droid in the movie, BB-8, has stolen everyone's hearts, but Tyson pointed out that the robotic ball would have had some trouble keeping up with the other characters:

We're assuming that Tyson is talking about this part:

Before getting into Tyson's criticisms, it's worth noting that the rolling robot really does work.

The filmmakers revealed a working prototype of the droid before the film was released. They created a robot version of the droid for the movie, and there's even an app-controlled toy robot that seems pretty fun.

There's actually a whole website dedicated to explaining how it works.

bb8 r2d2

That said, BB-8 is pretty poorly designed, according to NASA roboticist Brett Kennedy.

"Looking at the BB-8 droid, I would have to say the physics, it doesn't follow particularly well," Kennedy said in a video for Wired. "Trying to roll up and over anything is extremely difficult."

The problem, Kennedy said, is that with only one wheel like BB-8 has, you'd easily get stuck.

Depending on what kind of material the robot's main sphere is made of, Kennedy also noted that it would likely have trouble getting any traction over surfaces like sand.

The droid could function fine on flat, uniform surfaces, though. Kennedy compared it to kicking a soccer ball. But in "Star Wars," the characters don't stick to uniform, flat surfaces.

"How many places do you think that you've got enough flat ground that you can actually roll a soccer ball?" Kennedy asked.

It's no secret that Tyson loves "Star Trek" way more than "Star Wars," so we were expecting him to be pretty hard on the movie.

But even though he went after BB-8's plausibility as an all-environment droid, even Tyson can't deny that the droid is adorable:

SEE ALSO: People are saying that 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens' is amazing

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A 'Star Wars' star snuck into showings of 'The Force Awakens,' and fans flipped out

A physicist just wrote a paper on why destroying the Death Star would have wiped out the Ewoks

$
0
0

death star orbits endor moon 1

"The Ewoks are dead. All of them."

That's the disturbing first line of a white paper a physicist exclusively submitted to Tech Insider.

With "Star Wars: The Force Awakens"storming movie theaters, we had to know if George Lucas overlooked a critical moment where the last film in the series, "Return of the Jedi," left off 32 years ago.

In that movie, a moon-size weapon called the Death Star II orbits the forest moon Endor. The Rebel Alliance eventually blows up the colossal terror device, then celebrates among the trees with a race of hairy, intelligent friends called the Ewoks.

But detonating a giant metal sphere above the Ewok's lush green world is a terrible idea, according to 11 different physicists we asked. In fact, most agreed it'd trigger an "Endor holocaust."

Dave Minton, a planetary scientist at Purdue University and devoted "Star Wars" fan went so far as to provide a draft white paper. (We've embedded it at the end of this post if you want to get right to it.)

The "Endor Holocaust" fan theory dates back to 1997, when it first appeared on a website called TheForce.net. Curtis Saxton, an astrophysicist and "Star Wars" super-fan, argued in a 10,000-word essay that the doom of Endor and the Ewoks who live there "is an inevitable consequence of observable facts."

But many of Saxton's various measurements are open to interpretation, since depictions of the Death Star, Endor, and other details are inconsistent from one scene to the next, which is why we asked 11 physicists what would happen to Endor if the Death Star blew up.

Minton's dire conclusion is based a detailed, to-scale hologram projected in "Return of the Jedi."

death star endor hologram map shield generator

From that image Minton extrapolated diameters, masses, velocities, and orbital paths of Endor and the Death Star.

His calculations show that the Death Star II is about 213 miles in diameter.

Since Ewoks, storm troopers, and rebels move like they do here on Earth, he assumes that the gravity of Endor is the same as our home planet's and therefore so is its mass. As the moon is much smaller than Earth, however, it's got to be incredibly dense.

"I estimate that the bulk density of Endor is about 14,350 kg/m3," Minton wrote in his paper for Tech Insider. "This is more than iron (8000 kg/m3) and less than uranium (19,100 kg/m3), so while the composition of Endor must be quite unusual, it is not impossible."

Minton also noted that the Death Star is in a unnaturally stable orbit given how close it is to the moon.

"So I have to assume that the Death Star is being maintained in its position using something like [anti-gravity] repulsorlifts," he wrote.

When the rebels and Ewoks destroy the shield generator on Endor — a device that protected the Death Star — Minton assumes the repulsorlifts there got destroyed, too. He also figures the Death Star is not vaporized and mostly shatters into a field of loose rubble.

"[M]ore or less what happens after the destruction is that the entire mass of the Death Star simply falls onto the location of the shield generator," he said.

Minton said the falling rubble field would look something like a colossal asteroid striking the Earth.

asteroid impact strike hit nasa

Striking Endor at more than 6,000 mph, "a Death Star-mass ball of fragments will leave behind a 700 km diameter crater,"Minton said. "This is almost 4 times larger than the Chicxulub crater in Mexico that is associated with the dinosaur extinction."

"The aftermath of this impact would be to obliterate everything on the surface," he wrote. "No Ewok could withstand an impact of that magnitude."

And it gets worse.

"It is likely that the atmosphere would be so heated up ... that every body of water on the entire world would be flash heated to steam, and every forest would ignite into a global firestorm."

Read Minton's full draft white paper here.

Note: If you're a planetary scientist or physicist who can run simulations that test ideas critical to the Endor Holocaust theory, Tech Insider would love to hear from you. Please reach out to us at science@techinsider.io with "Endor Holocaust simulation" as the subject line.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Neil deGrasse Tyson explains what 'Star Wars' gets right about science

A simple property of water created this gorgeous photo

$
0
0

ice 1

It’s pretty cold in the north of Canada at any time of year, but in the winter, temperatures plummet to incredible lows.

Ontario-based photographer Michael Davies and his friend Markus stood at the top of a mountain and demonstrated this by throwing leftover tea into the air, dramatically photographing it instantaneously freezing.

This mountaintop was just 20 kilometers (12.4 miles) south of the Arctic Circle, and fairly close to Pangnirtung, the fly-in community where Davies has worked as a photographer for the last decade.

With weather around -35°C (-31°F), the tea – kept hot within the thermos flask – froze before it had even begun to fall to the snowy ground.

The winter months in Pangnirtung are as frigid as they are dark. “Between sunrise and sunset we only have 2.5 hours of light,” he explained to IFLScience.

In order to get this incredible shot, some natural light was required; he drove on a skidoo to a nearby mountain where the light, which is almost always pink near the winter solstice, would hit the ground.

Nothing was left to chance. “I followed the temperature, I watched for calm wind, planned the shot and set it up," Davies told IFLScience. "Even the sun in the middle of the spray was something I was hoping for, even though it’s impossible to control.”

You can peruse more of Davies’ beautiful photography on Flickr or on his own personal website.

READ MORE: People around the world are eating banana peels because they know something that Westerners do not

UP NEXT: Here's how ridiculously fast we could visit everything in the solar system if we traveled at the speed of light

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Animated map shows the history of immigration to the US

This is Neil deGrasse Tyson's favorite science joke

$
0
0

Neil deGrasse Tyson

If you've ever listened to StarTalk radio, then you'll know that its host, famed astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, definitely has a sense of humor.

His humor was not lost on Business Insider when we asked him in a recent interview about his favorite science joke.

Tyson first heard this joke first told by science comedian Brian Malow.

Here's how it starts:

"A Higgs boson walks into a church."

If you're unfamiliar with the term "Higgs boson," you might know it by another name: the "God" particle.

(No self-respecting scientist would ever call it this, but that hasn't stopped media outlets from preserving the term.)

To get the joke, you must first understand the Higgs.

A Higgs boson is a type of subatomic particle that is about one-hundredth the size of a proton. Scientists used the world's most powerful particle accelerator to see it for the first time in 2012, and their discovery was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics the following year.

This discovery was Nobel-worthy because Higgs bosons come with a special ability: They help give other subatomic particles their mass. Without the discovery of a Higgs boson, physicists would not understand how particles, like those that make up you, me, and the billions of galaxies in the universe, could exist.

Back to the joke, as told to Business Insider by Tyson:

"Higgs boson walks into a church, and the priest says, 'I'm sorry we don't allow Higgs bosons to come to churches.' And [the Higgs] says, 'But without me, you can't have mass.'"

dark matterJust to make sure this joke is politically correct, Tyson mentioned he had tested this joke on a Jesuit priest. "He said it was cool, so that gives us total clearance," Tyson said with a laugh.

This joke is particularly timely because the machine that first detected a Higgs boson in 2012, the Large Hadron Collider, is scheduled to turn back on — after two years of heavy maintenance — by the end of this month.

By mid-summer the LHC should be at max power, which is twice the power at which it operated during its first run, from 2009 through 2012. Physicists hope to explore the properties of Higgs bosons in more detail as well as discover some more never-before-seen particles like those that physicists think make up the mysterious material called dark matter.

LEARN MORE: You'll never guess what Neil deGrasse Tyson's favorite equation of Einstein's is

CHECK OUT: Neil deGrasse Tyson's 'most astounding fact about the universe' may bring you to tears

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Neil deGrasse Tyson: Here are the nerdiest things I've ever done

Why physicists are fascinated by Vincent van Gogh's episodes of 'psychotic agitation'

Viewing all 778 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images